Skip Navigation


QJM Advance Access originally published online on March 4, 2008
QJM 2008 101(5):371-379; doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcn014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
101/5/371    most recent
hcn014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, J.O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, N.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, J.O.J.
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, N.A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/>) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Predicting outcome in acute organophosphorus poisoning with a poison severity score or the Glasgow coma scale

J.O.J. Davies1, M. Eddleston1,2,3 and N.A. Buckley1,4

From the 1South Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration, 2Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, England, UK, 3Ox-Col Collaboration, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka, and 4Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Canberra Clinical School, ACT, Australia

Address correspondence to J.O.J. Davies, Department of Haematology, Hammersmith Hospital, London. email: james.davies{at}doctors.net.uk

Received 22 October 2007 and in revised form 8 January 2008


  Abstract

Background: Organophosphorus (OP) pesticide poisoning kills around 200 000 people each year, principally due to self-poisoning in the Asia-Pacific region.

Aim: We wished to assess whether patients at high risk of death could be identified accurately using clinical parameters soon after hospital admission.

Design: We evaluated the usefulness of the International Program on Chemical Safety Poison Severity Score (IPCS PSS) and the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) prospectively for predicting death in patients poisoned by OP pesticides.

Methods: Data were collected as part of a multicenter cohort study in Sri Lanka. Study doctors saw all patients on admission, collecting data on pulse, blood pressure, pupil size, need for intubation and GCS.

Results: Of the patients, 1365 with a history of acute OP poisoning were included. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for the IPCS PSS and GCS on admission. The IPCS PSS and GCS had similar ROC area under the curves (AUC) and best cut points as determined by Youden's index (AUC/sensitivity/specificity 0.81/0.78/0.79 for IPCS PSS >= grade 2 and 0.84/0.79/0.79 for GCS <=13). The predictive value varied with the pesticide ingested, being more accurate for dimethoate poisoning and less accurate for fenthion poisoning (GCS AUC 0.91 compared with 0.69).

Conclusions: GCS and the IPCS PSS were similarly effective at predicting outcome. Patients presenting with a GCS <=13 need intensive monitoring and treatment. However, the identity of the organophosphate must be taken into account, since the half of all patients who died from fenthion poisoning only had mild symptoms at presentation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.